icon

Usetutoringspotscode to get 8% OFF on your first order!

Discuss methodological congruence. Address:

Discuss methodological congruence. Address:
a. Adequate documentation of participants
b. Procedural rigor: study assumption articulated? Trust? Open dialogue?
c. Adherence to ethical standards?
d. Auditability sufficiently described?
Do not need Introduction and Conclusion. Just discuss the questions above.

You may use as a reference this file: http://keiranhenderson.com/articulate/Critiquing_research/data/downloads/critiquing_qualitative_research_bjn.pdf

Use simple language.

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

Discuss methodological congruence. Address:

Discuss methodological congruence. Address:
a. Adequate documentation of participants
b. Procedural rigor: study assumption articulated? Trust? Open dialogue?
c. Adherence to ethical standards?
d. Auditability sufficiently described?
Do not need Introduction and Conclusion. Just discuss the questions above.

You may use as a reference this file: http://keiranhenderson.com/articulate/Critiquing_research/data/downloads/critiquing_qualitative_research_bjn.pdf

Use simple language.

Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

Comments are closed.

Discuss methodological congruence. Address:

Discuss methodological congruence. Address:
a. Adequate documentation of participants
b. Procedural rigor: study assumption articulated? Trust? Open dialogue?
c. Adherence to ethical standards?
d. Auditability sufficiently described?
Do not need Introduction and Conclusion. Just discuss the questions above.

You may use as a reference this file: http://keiranhenderson.com/articulate/Critiquing_research/data/downloads/critiquing_qualitative_research_bjn.pdf

Use simple language.

Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

Comments are closed.

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes